Personal As Well As Societal Relationships â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Quesrtion: Discuss About The Personal As Well As Societal Relationships? Answer: Introducation The child has been identified to be present in level 2 where his sense of morality has been linked to that of personal as well as societal relationships. He is present in stage 4 which mainly concerns about law and order orientation. Here the child is seen to eat vegetable as a daily part of the meal along with meat as his mother had taught him that eating veggies are important for the body growth. The child has accepted the fact as a rule and believes that easting vegetable will help him to grow and be string like his father. He had said that whenever he wastes vegetable, his mother gives him punishments and whenever he completes his meal properly, he is rewarded with rides around the park which he loves. Hence, form this conversation, it is clearly understood that he is a blind follower of the rules which have been fixed by the families as well as the societies. In this stage. Kohlberg has mainly described an individual who sees rules in the same way by which others also looks at i t (Cherry 2014). Children obey rules by doing what one is taught or advised to do as they are imposed on them to be important as well as valuable (Araki 2014). The individual learns that if he violates any law, he would be punished and therefore he holds an obligation to perform any task as it is demanded from him by society and family (Krebs et al. 2014). Therefore the child also learns that it is good habit to have vegetable also if they are not tasty. Otherwise, he may not be taken to the park which is his perceived punishments. A marked difference in moral reasoning was noticed in the adolescent who was found to be falling in the category of level 3 in the stage 5 of social-contract orientation. In the interview, the adolescent boy stated that he had chosen himself to vegetarian not because he is forced or is advised by his parents. He had taken up vegetarian and morally he thinks killing lives for food is not ethical enough for human being who thinks himself as the brained and emotional souls n the earth. From the matured discussion, it is clearly seen that he has proved his moral reasoning beyond the shackle of rewards and punishments notions of the society and parental monitoring (Gibbs 2013). He has clearly learnt o understand the good and bad in each of the social customs and lifestyles mannerisms. He had learnt to judge on every aspect of lifestyles and pick up an opinion which according to him is the bet to develop the future world. In this way a marked difference was noted in the moral reasoning of the two individuals. References: Araki, N., 2014. AN APPLICATION OF KOHLBERGS THEORY OF MORAL DILEMMA DISCUSSION TO THE JAPANESE CLASSROOMAND ITS EFFECT ON MORAL DEVELOPMENT OF JAPANESE STUDENTS.Handbook of Moral and Character Education, p.308. Cherry, K., 2014. Kohlbergs theory of moral development.About. com Psychology. Gibbs, J.C., 2013.Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford University Press. Krebs, D.L., Vermeulen, S., Carpendale, J. and Denton, K., 2014. Structural and situational influences on moral judgment: The interaction between stage and dilemma.en: WM Kurtines et JL Gewirtz (eds.): Handbook of moral behavior and development,1, pp.139-169